Abstract: Per financial analysis, the most important corporations utilizing Homebase hiring software program publish jobs with the very best goal hourly wages. Surprisingly, nevertheless, I discover that among the smallest corporations utilizing Homebase hiring software program — these with only one to 4 staff — are keen to pay as a lot as 10% greater than these with 20-49 staff, giving them a newfound aggressive edge in a difficult marketplace for expertise.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hiring is prime of thoughts today, as companies of all sizes proceed to compete for employees in a decent labor market. And, on condition that one of the crucial constant findings in labor economics is the truth that bigger corporations pay greater wages than smaller corporations, you’d anticipate the most important employers to have little competitors when it comes to pay.
Apparently, in my very own latest analysis into Homebase hiring information, I’m discovering a shocking end result: Firms with one to 4 staff are keen to pay potential staff 10% greater than corporations with 20-49 staff — making these companies worthy rivals.

Supply: Homebase hiring information (January 2021 – March 2022). Observe: Outcomes from regression predicting Ln (goal hourly wage) as a perform of whole variety of staff, state, month, 12 months, month*12 months, particular enterprise description (e.g., grocery retailer, pet retailer, consulting) and choose job roles (e.g., chef, baker). Controlling for NAICS codes or coarse enterprise descriptions yield comparable outcomes; controlling for MSA, metropolis or zip code versus state yields constant outcomes, as does estimating fashions with out controls. Treating enterprise worker dimension as a steady variable with a squared-term yields constant conclusions. Strong, clustered (by institution customary error bars. Mannequin F=32.77***, R2 =0.22. All whole variety of worker indicator variables are statistically important at p < .05 (two-tailed exams) save for the 100 to 249 indicator variable.
How can the smallest corporations supply the next wage?
One clarification is that the smallest corporations generate, on a size-adjusted foundation, enough income to warrant a goal wage premium. Wanting into gross sales information for a specific sub-sample of Homebase prospects, I can predict the ratio of an organization’s month-to-month income to whole variety of staff — and discover that the smallest corporations get pleasure from a productiveness benefit. They earn roughly $4,500 extra per 30 days per worker than corporations with 20 to 49 staff (the baseline class for comparability). Whereas, the most important corporations within the Homebase pattern have the bottom gross sales to worker ratio.

Supply: Homebase hiring information (January 2021 – March 2022). Observe: Outcomes regulate for state, month, 12 months, zip code and NAICS code. Treating enterprise worker dimension as a steady variable with a squared-term yields constant conclusions, as does estimating a fractional logit mannequin. Strong, clustered (by institution customary error bars. Mannequin F=45.25***, R2 =0.79. All whole variety of worker indicator variables are statistically important at p < .05 (two-tailed exams) save for the ten to 19 indicator variable. Excluding from evaluation the businesses with the best gross sales (e.g., seventy fifth percentile or above) doesn’t change outcomes, nor does controlling for state or MSA versus zip code. Largest agency class omitted resulting from sub-sample dimension concerns.
Do the entire smallest corporations supply the next wage?
My evaluation accounts for a number of things that may clarify the next goal wage, together with job location, business, and seasonality. Nonetheless, there are situations the place the smallest corporations supply decrease goal wages than corporations with 20 to 49 staff:
- Meals & drink: The smallest corporations on this class pay roughly 4% much less.
- Roles with a goal wage of $15 or much less: The smallest corporations on this class supply a wage deficit of roughly 3.9%.
Operational concerns
Researchers typically outline and measure “massive” corporations as these with better than 10,000 employees, and “small” corporations as these with 100 or fewer. Nonetheless, there are appreciable operational variations between corporations with one to 4 staff and people with 20, 60, or 100 staff.
Massive companies are sometimes bureaucratic, formal, inflexible, and standardized. They are usually highly effective and prestigious, they usually have benefits that assist them make organizing and working extra environment friendly and economical. Annual rankings of the finest corporations to work for are, with out fail, lists of among the largest corporations within the nation. So, not surprisingly, a lot of these ranked are additionally the businesses new faculty graduates aspire and apply to work for.
The smallest companies are sometimes extra collegial, familial, versatile, and genuine. These companies have been accountable for 16.2% of gross job positive aspects in the USA within the second quarter of 2022 — and roughly 64% of job positive aspects in any respect new corporations (as most companies begin out small). However, most job losses at corporations which are closing happen within the smallest of corporations.
For a lot of of those very small corporations, a job posting utilizing Homebase hiring could be the primary rent they make—or the primary rent exterior of the unique circle of “family and friends” concerned within the enterprise. Moreover, the actual fact an organization is hiring means that the corporate has (projected) demand for its services or products at a stage the present worker base can’t comfortably meet. Such rising corporations might not be typical of all very small companies.
Conclusion
Hiring is tough even in the very best of occasions. However in a sizzling labor market just like the US is at the moment experiencing, hiring will be irritating and fruitless for all employers — particularly, the smallest. Small corporations shouldn’t have the identical model fairness as massive corporations, which implies they typically should expend extra time, effort, and cash reaching — after which educating and convincing — potential staff their small (however mighty!) companies are an excellent place to work.
The next goal wage — made potential by a productiveness edge — could put lots of the smallest companies in a greater place to compete with bigger employers for hourly employees. After all, it’s vital to additionally take into account that staff’ wants and wishes in work and a office are altering. As pay is just one issue candidates take into account when evaluating and evaluating competing presents, employers of all sizes should preserve abreast of their evolving preferences to compete to draw — and even retain — as we speak’s staff.
Methodology:
Utilizing Homebase hiring information, 1000’s of job posts from January 2021 – March 2022 have been analyzed. These job posts are primarily for hourly work. Homebase hiring information supply an vital analytical benefit as a excessive proportion of the job posts embrace the “goal wage” supplied for a selected job and time frame. (This permits for a cleaner evaluation of how corporations of various sizes set wages with out the confusion and confounding that may happen when a researcher can solely observe accepted wages.) Analyses primarily based on accepted wages can obscure the truth that job candidates with completely different preferences are drawn to differing types (and sizes) of corporations. Moreover, accepted wages may end up from a negotiation between the job seeker and employer. Stronger candidates—and particularly these with competing presents—will typically settle for greater wages, all else equal. Specializing in the goal wage set by a hiring employer earlier than any potential negotiations isn’t topic to those similar analytical issues.
Wage evaluation: Goal wage evaluation accounts for location, 12 months, month, 12 months and month, business, and most frequent job roles. Location was measured in a number of separate methods (e.g., state, MSA, metropolis, zip code), and business was measured at varied ranges of element (e.g., NAICS code, coarse classes, particular classes (i.e., “sit-down restaurant”). Outcomes remained constant no matter components: Firms with the smallest (1-4) whole variety of staff have been keen to pay potential staff greater wages. For the smallest corporations, the goal wage premium was 10% greater than corporations with 20-49 whole staff (the reference class). The smallest firm wage premium was roughly 12.7% within the residence and restore class.
Robustness check: To make sure that employers in sure industries/roles that have a tendency to prepare and function in smaller organizations weren’t skewing the outcomes, job posts with hourly goal wages better than $30 have been omitted. With this restriction, the scale of the smallest group wage premium remained massive (roughly 6.4%) and extremely statistically important. (The biggest agency wage premium is roughly 14.4% excluding these highest paying jobs.) Job posts with customized descriptions (a technique of measuring “uncommon instances”) supplied goal wage premiums of roughly 6% v. standardized roles, all else equal. This didn’t, nevertheless, clarify the smallest firm wage premium.